The management of sedimentation in a reservoir offers a comprehensive assessment of the sediment transportation and erosion processes. Understanding sedimentation is helpful for managing reservoirs. Dam silting volumes can be evaluated by bathymetric surveys. The Arzengarzen earthen dam in Budgam district of Jammu and Kashmir had two surveys conducted, and the data are available. Initial data regarding the amount and variability of silting as well as the mechanism of sediment deposition are provided by the measurements. The average annual specific sediment output of the Arzengarzen earthen dam watershed is projected to be 2851 t m3/yr based on measurement results. The average yearly volume of confined sediment varies, ranging from 2300 m3 in 2010 Over time, the sedimentation rate rises from 0.20 to 0.43%. The findings show a relationship between the presence of soils on steep slopes and particular rates of erosion. The only source of income in the area (Agriculture )is at risk due to the strain that the area\'s population has placed on the land through overgrazing and plowing, which has caused increased erosion and further deterioration.
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
Rainfall, particularly early in the rainy season, increases the movement of silt via watershed runoff. Because of the high flow velocity during rainy season, the stream flow separates more river bed particles, increasing the stream's capacity (the total mass of sediment) and competence (the maximum particle size it can carry). The flow energy and velocity of a stream reduce when it enters a reservoir, causing sediment to deposit. The small particles are often deposited along the reservoir's water flow direction, whereas the coarse silt is typically deposited at the reservoir's mouth.
Erosion poses a hazard to 53% of districts land area (Boussema, 1996). In dammed reservoirs, 2851 m3/yr of sediment are deposited yearly on average. As was already said, one of the main issues with dam is silt deposition, which raises the risk of flooding by reducing the amount of water that can be stored, which in turn affects the amount of flood water that can be stored. The decreased storage capacity has an impact on the reservoir's safe output to satisfy various water demands. Numerous models have been proposed for the study of siltation in reservoirs. For instance, a three-dimensional model of silt concentration and flow in reservoirs was presented by Campos (2001). He employed two bed load functions, one for each direction of the bed. In order to verify the model, both real field data and laboratory test data from Brazil's Itaipu Reservoir were taken into account. Laboratory test results showed that projections of sediment deposition through the reservoir and flow and sediment routing simulations agreed well. In order to compare the model outputs with the measured data, Pak et al. (2010) assessed a compatible reservoir sedimentation model using HEC-HMS, which was applied to two reservoirs. The outcomes showed that the daily flow rates and sediment loads could be reasonably predicted. Issa et al. (2013) used a bathymetric survey approach to estimate the usable life of Mosul Dam in Iraq. The study conducted by Mohammad et al. (2016) examined the silt deposition that occurred within the reservoir of the Mosul Dam between 1 utilizing the model HEC-RAS 4.1. During the study period, sediment depositional simulation was evaluated at monthly intervals (time step), and the pattern was evaluated at five-year intervals (1980, 1985, 1990, 1995,2000,2005 and 2010).
As a result, the simulation included the years 1975—when the Arzengarzen earthen dam operation started—through 2010. The yearly sediment output of a tiny (235m3) In this study, a sediment delivery ratio (USLE-SDR) in conjunction with the Universal Soil Loss Equation were used to quantify the suspended sediment intake to a reservoir. Three separate bed load formulas and the flow time curve were used to estimate the annual bed load. Four surveys of reservoir bathymetry were conducted. The amount of sediment deposited in the reservoir and the sediment input calculated using the bed load and USLE-SDR formulas agreed quite well.
III. METHODOLOGY
A bathymetric survey of the flooded portion of the reservoir and a direct topographical survey of the non-flooded portion, which is the area between the usual water level and the water level at the time of the measurement, are typically used to measure siltation in reservoirs. The foundation of the bathymetric survey is a straightforward comparison of the reservoir shape at two distinct points in time: the dam's construction and the survey's completion. A bathymetric survey of the reservoir bed was carried out along previously recognized transverse profiles in this study. This technique is straightforward and user-friendly, but it lacks precision and cannot be applied consistently to depths of less than five meters (Claude and Chartier, 1977). The cross section of the reservoir to be surveyed for this study is selected using a topographical plan of the dam reservoir's area at a scale of 1: 5000 and contour spacing of 2 m. Although there isn't a set criterion to follow, we usually look for cross sections that go to the wadi's bed, avoiding narrowing and ideally selecting the largest parts. If there are multiple branches that split from the reservoir,
Nine cross sections of the Arzengarzen earthen dam were located (Figure below). The topographical plan was used to determine the original (initial) cross section of the reservoir for each profile at the time of impoundment in 1975. Subsequently, bathymetric studies were carried out in order to determine the present reservoir depths. The original profile and the updated profile are contrasted. The area of siltation (measured in meters squared) of a section at the height of the water site where the measurements were taken is what is quantitatively determined in a GIS using the two profiles thus obtained and the profile's silted surface. The General Method was employed in this study to calculate the siltation volume. The angles between neighbouring sections, represented as Pa and Pb in (Figure below), are also taken into consideration by this method, which is based on silted portions of the surveyed profiles (Claude and Chartier, 1977; Alahiane et al., 2014).
The two retention profiles Pa and Pb's sediment surfaces, Sa and Sb, respectively, are first identified. The separation between these two profiles is then computed
To do this, we draw a line ab between the places where Pa and Pb are centred, and we draw a line cd at the centre of segment ab that is perpendicular to it. The lengths la and lb are determined by measuring the distance between points a and b and the midpoint (e) of segment cd.
The slopes αa and αb, respectively, for Pa and Pb in relation to the straight sections ea and eb are taken into consideration when calculating the total volume. Vab is entire volume (Claude and Chartier, 1977) as follows:
Diagram showing the whole approach to estimation
Conclusion
One natural process that is thought to be the main contributor to the degradation of agricultural land is water erosion. Corrective action must be taken before soils lose their fertility. The volume of sediment trapped in the Arzengarzen earthen dam can be estimated thanks to the siltation measurements that are shown here. It is claimed that agricultural land could once again receive the sediment that was trapped. Precise mapping of the reservoir bed and the choice of profiles affect the accuracy of the sedimentation estimation approach. It is important to create siltation measures that will track the progress of a dam\'s life span and enhance operational conditions on a regular basis. The outcomes of these actions have brought attention to the considerable erosion that the Arzengarzen earthen dam\'s watershed experiences. Utilizing a runoff and erosion model with distributed physical factors throughout the watershed helps enhance comprehension of the variables
References
[1] Alahiane, N., El Mouden, A., Lhaj, A. A., and Boutaleb, S.: Practical Method Proposed to Estimate Silting’s Rate in Small and Hillside Dams, J. Water Resour. Protect., 6, 930–943, 2014.
[2] Banasik, K., Gorski, D., Popek, Z., and Hejduk, L.: Estimating the annual sediment yield of a small agricultural catchment in central Poland, in: Erosion and Sediment Yields in the Changing Environment, edited by: Collins, A. L., Golosov, V., Horowitz, A. J., Lu, X., Stone, M., Walling, D. E., and Zhang, X., IAHS Publ., 356, 267–275, 2012.
[3] Annandale, G., Morris, G., Jiang, E., Zhang, J., Cao, Y., Carling, P., Fu, K., Guo, Q., Hotchkiss, R., Peteuil, C., Sumi, T., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Wei, Z., Wu, B., Wu, C., and Yang, C.: Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: Experiences from five continents, Earths Future, 2, 256–280, 2014.
[4] Mathlouthi, M. and Lebdi, F.: Modélisation de la relation pluie– ruissellement par durée d’épisode pluvieux dans un bassin du Nord de la Tunisie, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 1111–1122, 2010.
[5] Mohammad, E. M., Al-Ansari, N. A., Issa, I., and Knutsson, S.: Sediment in Mosul Dam reservoir using the HEC-RAS model, Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, 21, 235–244, 2016.
[6] Pak, J., Fleming, M., and Ely, P.: Assessment of reservoir trap efficiency methods using the hydrologic modelling system (HECHMS) For the upper north Bosque River watershed in central Texas, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference (9th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference and 4th Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modelling Conference), Las Vegas, Nevada, 27 June–1 July 2010.
[7] Walling, D. and Webb, B.: Erosion and sediment yield: A global overview, in: Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives: IAHS Publ., 236, 3–19, 1996.
[8] Walling, D., Young, G., and Perillo, G.: Changing fluvial sediment inputs to the world’s deltas, Deltas: Landforms, Ecosystems and Human Activities, 358, 12–25, 2013. Proc. IAHS, 377, 35–40, 2018